Menu / Nutritional Labeling is Good… But It Won’t Change Much!
Ryan | August 9th, 2010 | No Comments »Consumer research firm Mintel found that more than 60 percent of consumers want nutritional info posted on menus. However, the same 60 percent of respondents said they look for menu items that taste great. Only 23 percent say they want a healthy meal.
In January, the Pediatrics Journal reported that mothers made better choices for their children when provided with the calorie info but didn’t make those same decisions for themselves. In the randomized, controlled study, 99 parents of children ages 3 to 6 were given a McDonald’s menu and asked to choose what they might order – just as if they were in the restaurant.
Those who got the menus with calorie info ordered an average of 102 fewer calories for their kids than a control group not given that information. But there was no calorie difference between the two groups in what PARENTS ordered for themselves. So why don’t they make better choices for themselves?
“Maybe in other areas of health, like smoking, they may be more inclined to be healthier when they know it’s going to affect their children,” says Dr. Pooja Tandon, Pediatric Researcher from Seattle Children’s Research Institute.
And you know what? The doc is right! People are typically going to advise their kids against taking up the parents’ vices, but unless someone wants to eat healthier chances are they won’t. Posting the calories on a menu may be needed to help those who can’t help themselves to make healthy decisions, but come on, are you telling me that the guy who orders 1 bucket of KFC’s finest, is gonna say, “Geez, the bucket actually has 50 trillion calories, so let me get a grilled chicken salad this time!” Nope, he’s not gonna say that! He’s gonna say “Damn, those 50 million calories sure taste great – and their less than $3.99 too!”
I see lawsuits coming down the pike – the same way the Marlboro Man got reamed in court. People are gonna take restaurateurs to town because they “made my loved one overweight, blocked his arteries and made his heart stop.” Think about it, if a cigarette’s warning label didn’t help, why would menu labeling? Don’t get me wrong – I don’t smoke, I’m a former (out of shape) track athlete and I am all for a healthy lifestyle. But imposing menu labeling on restaurateurs - thinking that it’s gonna MAKE consumers eat better- it generally won’t. It will do the following:
- increase the operational expenditure of these establishments
- increase the marketing expenditure. (To be honest, I personally don’t mind this part since this is how I’m able to keep the lights on!
- cause more service-confusion by having servers who get paid less than minimum wage become in-house health advisors / dieticians
- mislead consumers into thinking that little calories mean good calories.
Here are my recommendations:
- Recommend labeling it but don’t make it mandatory.
- Focus more energy on targeting the menus in schools
- Have the FDA impose greater guidelines for resource manufacturers – for example, the cooking oil producer.
- …and I’m sure there are a bunch more better ideas.
Maybe I’m just too narrow-minded, but what do you think about this? Check out other viewpoints from a chef and a personal trainer.